IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Former DJ cleared of child porn
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
In The Know |
robbiex wrote:
I've never heard of this dj, however I was just wondering, how did the case ever get to court. I thought that the only way that they could discover what people have viewed through credit card payments like in operation Oar?
Maybe he took it into a shop for repair (some years ago Currys called the police when they found something on a machine didn't they?) |
|
Innocent Accused |
veritas wrote:
steveimp wrote:
Blackit wrote:
Surprised this hasn't already made its way here :
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/8185541.stm
One image found on his computer. Level 1 severity - i.e the lowest, which is probably, as we all know, as a teenager in a bikini or swimming trunks.
He's hardly a hardcore peadophile or consumer of child porn if he had a single level 1 picture on his harddrive, intentionally downloaded or not.
Witchhunt.
I look on Facebook at friends, family etc, with pictures of their kids in the bath, or in swimming trucks or suits, is that child porn?
Wait a minute, could people be arrested, charged and perhaps convicted of looking at a photo of a relative enjoying the sun or enjoying water???
This is seriously crazy.
errr...yes you could. If you are in one the US state of Maine it's now an offense to stare at a child for too long.
Yet in my case they've not been near my comp,a thing JK pointed out to use in my defence. |
|
veritas |
steveimp wrote:
Blackit wrote:
Surprised this hasn't already made its way here :
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/8185541.stm
One image found on his computer. Level 1 severity - i.e the lowest, which is probably, as we all know, as a teenager in a bikini or swimming trunks.
He's hardly a hardcore peadophile or consumer of child porn if he had a single level 1 picture on his harddrive, intentionally downloaded or not.
Witchhunt.
I look on Facebook at friends, family etc, with pictures of their kids in the bath, or in swimming trucks or suits, is that child porn?
Wait a minute, could people be arrested, charged and perhaps convicted of looking at a photo of a relative enjoying the sun or enjoying water???
This is seriously crazy.
errr...yes you could. If you are in one the US state of Maine it's now an offense to stare at a child for too long. |
|
steveimp |
Blackit wrote:
Surprised this hasn't already made its way here :
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/8185541.stm
One image found on his computer. Level 1 severity - i.e the lowest, which is probably, as we all know, as a teenager in a bikini or swimming trunks.
He's hardly a hardcore peadophile or consumer of child porn if he had a single level 1 picture on his harddrive, intentionally downloaded or not.
Witchhunt.
I look on Facebook at friends, family etc, with pictures of their kids in the bath, or in swimming trucks or suits, is that child porn?
Wait a minute, could people be arrested, charged and perhaps convicted of looking at a photo of a relative enjoying the sun or enjoying water???
This is seriously crazy. |
|
robbiex |
I've never heard of this dj, however I was just wondering, how did the case ever get to court. I thought that the only way that they could discover what people have viewed through credit card payments like in operation Oar? |
|
|
|
|
