Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: China beats the USA to discovering the ALIENS !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
BR |
This weekend PROJECT CAMELOT : Awake and Aware Conference is in LA.
This is a prediction from David Wilcox who is speaking at that weekend.
1. Economic Collapse is imminent and it will anger the public who will rise up and complain.
2. The NEW Michael Moore Movie will be central to this and he is going after THE BAILOUT ROBBERY !!! Goldman Sachs are targeted ( the NWO ) and it will reveal that the truth about the NWO ( at last - the truth will come out )
3. He says dont get rid of assetts - because the collapse will lead to a re-arrangement of the economy ( but not the NWO ) it is positive.
4. The Illuminati will disclose New Technology that they have been "sitting on" for many years. We will have a second tech revolution.
5. We are surrounded by UFOs at the moment and they are waiting for an invitation. This is due to Galactic Law like the Prime Directive in Star Trek !!
There will be disclosure one way or another by end of 2012.
Pretty big stuff - and the true stuff of "Conspiracy Theories"
I have no idea whether this guy is right or not - we will just have to wait and see. As we know BLOSSOM GOODCHILD made a prediction which was totally bonkers but grabbed everyone's imagination. Time will tell and if he is right then of course we are some of the first people to be awake and aware to this. If he is wrong - never mind !! I suppose at some point in history this planet will be visited openly by other species. We cant be the only ones ?
I wonder if CHINA will announce it in conjunction with their "sighting" which in reality is a positive ID that there are UFOs which are just outside our atmosphere........ |
|
Dominic Dee |
Nothing strange about not going back to the moon. It's just a lump of rock and not worth spending billions on, although India recently sent an un-manned mission there. It cost India approx. £40m and took place just after Gordon Brown had donated £40m in aid to India.
I guess building and equiping the space station and hubble telescope has taken most of the funding. Next intended stop for man seems to be Mars.
btw the moon is less than 2000 miles in diameter, so a 500 mile UFO next to it would be visible to anyone with an average telescope or even good binoculars, unless it's hidden behind the moon. |
|
BR |
More information today suggesting that most of China including the Observatory was in cloud that day.
Strange story.
I might add locked out that NO WHERE have I said that I "believe" this story. I await the footage before I believe it.
I find it hard to believe that you keep putting "Opinions" and "words" into my mouth ? to then heap criticism on them.
Many posts I put on here are for discussion. Just because I post something on the EDL or UFOs or BLOSSOM does not mean I believe it at all - they are just good stories for us to discuss.
This ( as far as I am aware ) is not a forum in which you have to "win" points and "prove" an argument. But one where you can report on something you have seen - whether on TV or Film or in life or News - and comment.
A 500 mile UFO which was near the moon would not be very big I might add. It all depends how far from the Earth it was. I have no idea why they have claimed it is a 500 mile UFO - and to be fair it sounds a bit strange.
But not as strange as the fact that NASA has not been back to the moon for 20 years - and have announced today they are unlikely to go back until 2050 at the earliest.....what is that all about ? |
|
Emma Bee |
Haley's comet, well outside of Earth's atmosphere, was a mere 9 miles x 5 miles and yet could be seen with the naked eye even in daylight. I think a 500 miles UFO would have been seen by millions by now. The chinese report says they have seen an object which they want to study before making any decision on it. That's not quite the same as claiming they've dicovered a huge UFO lurking above the planet. |
|
Locked Out |
You're not seriously suggesting that something that big could go unreported for so long are you? I fthis were true it would be massive news. That it isn't speaks volumes.
Are you aware that the word "gullible" does not appear anywhere in the OED? |
|
|
|
