Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Driving the neighbours kid to school can get you a £5000 fine.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
JK2006 |
Fair point about the "soft intelligence" Francis - but the predator of the future, now knowing this new law, would either not apply (if there is soft - or hard - intelligence) and find another way to get victims or would apply to get the government approval for abducting - oops, sorry, driving - children.
It is mad as well as immoral. |
|
Francis D |
Under the current system, even if Huntley had not been convicted of murder, he would have failed a CRB check because he had past allegations against him even though he had never been charged. This is what is meant by soft intelligence. Decisions are based on suggestion, gossip and innuendo. This is a giant step backwards for Britain, dismantling centuries of carefully constructed safeguards which were built into the legal system to protect the innocent. Now we are all guilty until we prove otherwise.
The Soham investigation was sloppy, and it's consequences have been worse than disastrous. I cannot say with 100% certainty that Ian Huntley was guilty, but his case has been used, along with that of Sarah Payne, as an emotional leverage to further remove the rights of the British people and to introduce laws which the Victorians would have viewed as draconian. |
|
JK2006 |
It is worse than that. It will assist and enable child abuse.
An intelligent predator without any previous problems will deliberately buy a licence for £64 and children will trust someone who says "it is fine to come with me - look, here's my government licence".
It is an incredibly stupid and dangerous development; guaranteed to increase abuse and murder.
Huntley would have applied for (and been given) a licence. |
|
BR |
Why should the rest of us be treated like this because of one person ?
The point is this : Huntley would have passed a CRB and this check. There was no record of any allegations against him - they were dug up by the press. He would have passed every check possible.
In fact this law will just drive the real PAEDOs even further underground. They will carry on doing what they do and laugh at the rest of society having to pay for to prove they are innocent.
In the UK we used to be INNOCENT UNTIL PROVED GUILTY. Now we have pay for a check to prove we are trustworthy around others. That is quite ridiculous.
This is the most NAZI FASCIST law ever passed by any democracy in history. It will go down as the LOW POINT Of the New Labour disaster.
New Labour have led to the DIRECT death of MILLIONS of innocent men women AND children.
I would like to allege that EVERY NEW LABOUR MP has the blood on their hands of at least 100,000 IRAQUI children. That MUST be on their CRIMINAL CHECKS.
No one should ever employ or let a NEW LABOUR Politician or supporter near their family. They are PURE SCUM.
In addition after DE MENEZES and TOMLINSON no Policeman should be allowed to work near anyone of an ethnic or working class and especially children. Their records should also show these FACTS. |
|
Anthony |
robbiex wrote:
This law was borne out of the fact that Ian Huntley was working as a school caretaker, even though he had a history of complaints from under age girls. Huntley went on to murder 2 young girls (please don't try and defend Ian Huntley).
I have no interest in defending Huntley. The fact that everyone still knows the name Ian Huntley seven years after his crime proves how rare people like him are. Do you really think this justifies the persecution of people who have had complaints made against them, which could have been entirely fictitious, and in any event have led to no prosecution? This law has piled more grease onto a slippery slope which this country is already sliding down. |
|
|
|
