Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: The ELITE PAEDOPHILES :
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
veritas |
I think kids will and always have experimented with sex when the urge kicks in but for the last 20 years guilt has been bred into them.
It's a bizarre situation-children are exploited sexually by adults in advertising for profit and made to feel dirty or guilty at the same time. No wonder everyone is confused.
I agree with JK's assessment of GG..I first saw him in a free concert in a park when he first developed the persona and was blown away....rhythmic jungle drumming with TWO drummers..over the top, brilliant, exciting. And we had no idea who he was. High camp. |
|
JK2006 |
I'm very much in favour of education and information and don't agree, BR, that it provokes activity... with the details must come moral values and practical advice.
Kids will always make mistakes; decent adults guide them wisely and responsibly.
As for GG, his older, pantomime performances were magnificent, over the top, tongue in cheek displays of villains and heroes and cartoon caricatures; marvellous shows with, of course, great music and I think the fan reaction was deliberately over the top too. |
|
BR |
Excellent posts Locked Out and Angel. Agree with you.
You only have to look at the behaviour of hormonally supercharged girls down the ages to see that their behaviour is basically a way to express themselves. A totally innocent way for most. What our society in 2009 is doing is trying to harness that sexual awakening and turn it via Sex Education and the Media into something more concrete and real. That is why I disagree with ramming sex ed. and sexualisation into the heads of hormonally supercharged kids. It is bound to lead to under age pregnancy and MORE experimentation - under the age of consent when the kids should just be innocently admiring a pop star or movie star and maybe in extreme cases throwing their underwear........ LOL
I might add that when I saw Glitter at Wembley Arena in the 90s women were still screaming for him and getting het up !!! I have no idea why. He was a Pantoesque Performer who always provided full value for the ticket price I suppose !! |
|
DR2 |
I recall that young girls...11 and 12 years old...were screaming hysterically and actually throwing their knickers at Gary Glitter at his on stage concerts back in 1973. It looked like they actually wanted him to ravage them and maybe they did. What they ever saw in him, I don't know. But then again, I was a male. It would be interesting to hear from women who were young girls back then and who used to scream hysterically at Gary Glitter and throw their knickers at him and hear them explain why they did it and what they saw in him. |
|
Locked Out |
Windows {no matter which version} creates multiple copies of any image you download {I think up to 8 copies exist throughout your OS}. All of these {unless you have a really good barrister who knows the score and is up for challenging the police - a dangerous pastime in itself - on this and can get the count reduced to a more realistic level} tend to get produced by the police as "images". However many barristers either can't be bothered {especially the legal aid ones} or meet with obstructive practices {like technical reports being "unavailable" up until the very last minute}. Given this fact it's easy to see how 10 images can become 80 or 90, and 500 {a figure which would, even in this day and age, only result in a caution} can become 4,000 {which would get you 6 months to a year minimum with even a sensible judge}.
I think we should take the figure of 20,000 with an exceedingly large dose of salt.
Any number is unacceptable, however, if they truly were graphic nudes. We shouldn't kid ourselves that this isn't a harmful "market", and there ARE people who make huge amounts of money out of sexualising children. |
|
|
|
