Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Vanessa George gets a minimum of 7 years
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Emma Bee |
"According to reports in the Daily Mail" 
I wonder what their original reports said about Sean Hodgson or Angela Canning? |
|
JK2006 |
I wouldn't want the Daily Mail looking after my posters either, Tim.
Take a stupid woman, prime her with sympathy and the right questions, make her feel loved by sweet words and kind sympathy, and our wonderful British cops can make anyone admit to anything.
Except, it appears, giving the names of "victims", which would earn her a lesser sentence.
So why isn't this woman making up names then? Probably because she's too stupid to know how to, if the "victims" don't actually exist.
It's not quite as obvious as it seems. Penetration by objects would probably cause injuries of some kind. None reported.
"We'll probably never know the identity of the victims" says Plod.
Hmm. Wonder why not. |
|
Tim |
Seven years? They should throw away the bloody key.
According to the reports in the Daily Mail, she used an object to penetrate one of the children, this one offence alone carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
How many of you guys would want her looking after your children? |
|
JC |
So far as I'm aware they can only interview you without a solicitor if you wave the right to legal representation, or if your solicitor agrees to it. In either case it's best to reply to all questions with "No comment". |
|
Innocent Accused |
JK2006 wrote:
From Day One something really stinks about the entire episode.
Trouble is we only heard what the courts and meejah wanted us to hear.She was initially questioned without a solicitor! In Italy for example it is illegal to do this,should be the same here,would certainly cut down on bad convictions. |
|
|
|
