cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Boys aged 10 charged with raping eight-year-old
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas crikey..I didn't know all this stuff was on youtube !

I only go there to see singers I like , like Susan Boyle or the Beatles channel, Joni Mitchell and so on.

I must make sure I never make Jedward a favourite..God only knows what they will say.
DR2 Yes, there are plenty of hypocrites (there, I spelt it right this time) on YouTube. At the moment, there are some very nasty comments about a video of a 2002 BBC 2 programme entitled "The Search For Britain's Paedophiles", featuring an interview with the late paedophile Mark Hansen, who, a few hours after the intervirew, killed himself rather than go to prison for sexually interfering with young boys.

The vitriol of some of the posters about Mark Hansen and the obscure, largely censored and blanked out video footage of Hansen and a couple boys is very potent. One guy described in detail how he would hunt down and kill Hansen for what he was and what he'd done. Obviously, he hadn't watched the video properly, or he'd have known that Hansen has already been dead for over seven years. But seriously, would he really want to go to prison for life for murdering someone he didn't know who was accused of molesting a boy that he, the poster, had never met? If he went around killing everybody he didn't agree with, he'd soon find himself locked up for a good many years.

Then there are the "Oh, my God! I feel sick watching this! I'm going to throw up!" types, of which there are many on YouTube. Well, if it makes them sick to watch it, then why are they watching it? Are they really serious when they state that watching a paedophile being interviewed by a BBC reporter and seeing some extremely grainy and indistinct photos of a man laying on a bed with a boy sends them rushing to the toilet to vomit in the toilet basin? If so, they can't have seen very much in life if they are so easily shocked by such blurry images. Most of us have seen far worse things than that, as bad as it is.
JK2006 Not a game I would encourage anyone to play Incognito; but I see what you're saying.
Incognito On every forum, sooner or later, there is somebody who feels the need to shout loudly that they are less of a paedophile than everybody else.

I've learn't to be very wary of such people.

A few years back, I used to have fun whenever I encountered such a person in a forum or a chatroom. I would create the fake profile of a 15 year old girl and then send a private message to the person. And you know what? Time after time they would take the (jail)bait. One time I was in Yahoo London chat at the height of the Soham Pedohysteria witchhunts. Some nerd had come into the room screaming about what they should do to Huntley and how the harddrives of every single person in the country needed to be examined. Within ten minutes he was arranging to meet up with me for sex (a '15 year old girl').

Just go to YouTube and do a search for 'sexy girl dance' and then click on the profiles of some of the people screaming 'kill the paedophiles' in the comments below. At least 20% of the time you will see that they have favourited some really dodgy videos. And that's just the pedocrites who are stupid enough to leave such evidence!

I looked at the profile once of somebody who had left some particularly nasty comments under a JK video on YouTube - his favourites folder contained nothing but pre-teen gymnast videos!

There are so many disturbed people on this planet.
veritas Pete Clarke wrote:
You're right, and I agree with mostly everything you say.

What gets me though, is the almost constant assertion that in any high profile case - be it sexual abuse by a nursery worker, or an extreme act of thuggery by a footballer - the accused is innocent, and that the police, CPS, et al have been either corrupt or incompetent.

People DO commit terrible crimes, you know. And when they are caught they deserve to be punished for them.

Of course, there are many miscarriages of justice, and I sympathise greatly with anyone who has been wrongly accused of any crime.

However, when crimes involving the abuse of children are discussed here, some of the comments make me very uncomfortable, so maybe you're right, this isn't the place for me anymore.

I started coming here when it was a music industry message board. It stopped being that a long time ago, but I kept coming 'cos I liked the stuff that was being talked about.

I wish you all well. Goodbye.


Without wishing to be rude I think Pete is taking a head in the sand approach. No-one on here or I'm sure anywhere would wish a person who does a child harm not to be punished.

But there is something happening and it's going to encroach upon everyone in some way eventually. The post about photographers being hassled is one example..law enforcement is beginning to act illegally at times and the Menedez murder followed by the other death by an innocent bystander should demonstrate that adequately.

In sex cases there is an unholy alliance between authorities and the media..a line has been crossed- and that is having a disastrous effect and I believe does little to protect children and I believe I could advance a dozen arguments that prove it does the opposite-harms children.

Ignoring it will not make it go away and people should feel unconfortable. If they don't, that is a problem.