Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: Paedo gives 400k to girl guides Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
In The Know |
... services rendered ? |
veritas |
Mad if they don't take it (and I bet they do after a suitable period of pondering). It was money honestly earned and left for a good reason.
It isn't 'blood money'. |
The Fat Controller |
As JK might say 'it's a good story' ...there's sex and torture behind it. |
Locked Out |
robbiex wrote:
[quote]
The difference here my friend is that this guy didn't earn his money from been {sic} a paedophile, unlike those poppy farmers who earned their money from selling drugs, or those people traffickers (whom I still condemn) earned their money from trafficking people. I'm sure if this post was made by anyone else, you would be in full support of it.
I posted what I posted because I disagreed with what you said, and I drew illustrations as to why I disagreed with it. And you're wrong. I'd have disagreed with it had anyone posted it. |
Blackit |
@lockedout
that's surely a false analogy. If this guy had made that £400,000 through taking nude photographs of the children he had abused, everybody would see the dilemma and those comparisons you're drawing would be valid.
His money is as good as everybody elses. The girl guides are not condoning or promoting anything he did during his life by accepting it. Nobody is giving him a pardon in return for the money. Something good for children is coming out of this man's life after all. How can anyone have a problem with that? Would you be o.k. with the money going to his victims, or would they be guilty of accepting tainted pedo dust cash too? |
|
|
|