cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Victims families - the Lord Chancellor speaks...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Court Watcher I can't understand if those affected by a tragedy (like the relatives of murder victims) are brought into the judicial equation, why the other victims (relations of the person who committed the crime) cannot be heard too?
And why stop there?
Those affected by hearing about or reading about it?
If we are moving away from the facts into the emotions - can we try Tony Blair, the Prime Minister who has caused me great distress knowing MY TAX MONIES have been paid to murder innocent Iraqui civilians?
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk