Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Al Megrahi controvery
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
In The Know |
It's a year ago today that Al Megragi was released. |
|
In The Know |
Angel wrote:
You can never be 100 percent accurate on how an individual will stay alive after diagnosis. Ask Ronnie Biggs.
According to the Labour Party, angel, the average length of time for someone to live is 19.2 months after chemotherapy has commenced.
Megrahi had not even begun chemotherapy !
Where did this "three months" come from, angel ?
And why are the Scots government so unwilling to say ?
<<< Suspicions are growing about the medical evidence used to justify the release of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing. Investigation by Paul Hutcheon and Tom Gordon
JUSTICE secretary Kenny MacAskill is under further pressure over his decision to free the Lockerbie bomber after cancer experts questioned whether Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi has less than three months to live. Megrahi, released from prison by the SNP government on compassionate grounds, told the Sunday Herald that he was about to undergo a course of chemotherapy, which could prolong his life even longer.
The three-month prognosis is now under greater scrutiny after two of the UK's most senior prostate specialists said the Libyan could live for another year. David Neal, professor of surgical oncology at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, said: "For somebody with just generally hormonally-lapsed prostate cancer with metastases, the time-scales are usually 12 to 18 months."
Professor Roger Kirby - chairman of the charity Prostate UK, founder of the Urology Foundation and director of The Prostate Centre - said MacAskill could have "egg on his face" after accepting that Megrahi's terminal cancer left him just three months to live.
The comments pile pressure on MacAskill to justify his decision ahead of Wednesday's parliamentary debate on the release of the only man ever convicted of killing 270 people in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in 1988. >>> from Herald Scotland (even the Scottish newspapers don't believe a word of it, angel !!!!)
www.heraldscotland.com/megrahi-how-long-...-really-got-1.826329 |
|
Angel |
In The Know wrote:
angel wrote:
Do you think his illness is fake then?
I think it is very, very convenient !
And, as the prognosis (3 months to live) was clearly wrong, it makes you wonder, doesn't it?
You can never be 100 percent accurate on how an individual will stay alive after diagnosis. Ask Ronnie Biggs. |
|
In The Know |
Marcus wrote:
There's one big problem I have with all this; I've looked at the facts (NOT theories) surrounding this case, and the evidence against this man is ENTIRELY underwhelming.
Indeed, Marcus ... it is highly unlikely that Megrahi is actually guilty.
That gives ITK a bit of a problem ... not sure whether I am on his side (as an innocent framed) or against him (as he's been used as a pawn in a game that rewards big buisiness and the oil merchants).
One thing is for certain ... those who lost family and friends on Pan Am 103 have been sacrificed. |
|
Marcus |
There's one big problem I have with all this; I've looked at the facts (NOT theories) surrounding this case, and the evidence against this man is ENTIRELY underwhelming. |
|
|
|
