cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Police used illegal tasar to execute Raoul Moat
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Bruce Bruce Which execution? He shot himself and even if the police had shot him, it would not be deemed an execution unless it could be proven that they did so unnecessarily and to deliberately kill as a penalty.
One less piece of human garbage in the world now as far as I can see. I would expect no less had I or any of mine behaved in the same manner.
Sheila The use of the new Taser was at the local force's discretion - as dictated by the Home Office.

A potential breach of the Firearms Act is based on another aspect of the affair - concerning procedure.

In a day or so, we'll know the detail.
Blackit uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20100927/tuk-raoul-m...itted-45dbed5_3.html

Firearms officers who used a Taser gun during a stand-off with fugitive Raoul Moat may have committed a crime, Sky News has learnt.

It had been claimed the use of the experimental Taser was at the discretion of individual forces.

But it has now emerged that the Home Office believes the officers who fired the gun breached the Firearms Act.