cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Raoul Moat Taser-man kills himself
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
anon JK2006 wrote:
"...political dissatisfaction should never and will never be a successful defence against murdering innocent people." So, Anon, killing Hitler (and saving the lives of millions) would not have been a successful defence?
To add to my last post...
I meant that it would never be a successful defence in a court, murdering an innocent person because you are dissatisfied with government policy. Sorry for not being clearer.
anon JK2006 wrote:
"...political dissatisfaction should never and will never be a successful defence against murdering innocent people." So, Anon, killing Hitler (and saving the lives of millions) would not have been a successful defence?
I was speaking from a Christian point of view (though I am not one)since BR cited Christian ethics
in defence of his position, a 'true' Christian would not take up arms against another nation nor fight for the politics or align themselves under the flag of any nation. Jesus stated when standing before pontius Pilate, having been scourged.... King James Bible
"My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence."hence confirming his political neutrality. There were many conscientious objectors on both sides during the war, many reasoning that they could not claim top be Christians whilst participarting in the death of their 'spiritual' brothers of another nation and many other innocent civillians.
A 'true' Christian would choose death over fighting in war as did the first century Christians. Of course, shortly after jesus death, the predicted wolves and false prophets would turn religion in to what we see today.
None of this means that a Christian may not defend themselves if attacked say in the home or on the street but 'self' defence and war are separate issues from the 'true' Christian point of view.
Confused By BR "A Christian LOVES their enemies. A Christian does good to people who HATE them."

Looking forward to you showing how much you love the police in future postings.
In The Know anon wrote:
Moat (an awfully decent chap) was a woman beating 'roid' raging illegal gun owning thug. I for one am happy that this piece of human garbage is no more and glad that he gave cause for the police to shoot him. I will save my tears for a more worthy cause.

Says who ?

Are the police now Judge, Jury and Executioner ?
JK2006 "...political dissatisfaction should never and will never be a successful defence against murdering innocent people." So, Anon, killing Hitler (and saving the lives of millions) would not have been a successful defence?