cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Daily Mail paywall
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
BR Maybe they will
Innocent Accused Be a loss,but others will take over,eventually.
Prunella Minge They'll make a fortune out of you, matey!
BR Best website on the net - but I cant justify paying for a website where there are adverts and so on.

Without people being able to link to their stories it will go down hill very fast.

Not going to work. I visit the current site for all my news - but will now have to rely on the GUARDIAN and BBC and TELEGRAPH - whom all have decent enough sites.

If all newspapers go behind walls - then in the end they will destroy themselves. Murdoch will see them all off and then come out from behind his walls.

The times only has 100,000 subscribers when it used to get MILLIONS each week before. So it has failed completely. In addition I can see subscribers to non specialist sites drying up and actually going down rather than up after the first year.

This is a broken model which will fail.
Plissken Great news. The less people exposed to it the better.