cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Assange argument against extradition
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas Fascinating.

the words that stick out for me- "an abuse of process"

it surely is. Perhaps it is designed to fail.
SJB Well, I have no idea what that means but thanks for fixing it Jim.
Jim Thanks for posting this, SJB.

Unfortunately the link appears broken. You may like to know how to post links like this without allowing them to break.

In cases like this where characters within the URL are being misinterpreted, in this case the tilde character (~), you can solve the problem by putting the URL in a "url" tag:

www.fsilaw.com/~/media/Files/Publication...ment%2011_01_11.ashx

Hope this helps.

Best Wishes,
Jim
SJB Mr Assange has been quite quiet lately. I thought people might find this document interesting, published on his solicitors' website at his request.

www.fsilaw.com/~/media/Files/Publications/IP_Media/Preliminary%20Assange%20Skeleton%20Argument%2011_01_11.ashx

It looks like a strong argument with many equally strong threads, but I don't think that will stop the powers that be using the "yeah but.." counter argument and then doing exactly as they like.