cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Prisoners' Voting Rights
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Locked Out I just heard Ken Clarke being interrogated on the subject of his "controversial" decision to enforce the legal requirements of the European Court with regard to prisoners' voting rights.
After all this time... after all the flanneling and all the deliberate delaying tactics... this is still seen as some kind of nice point of law, and one to be challenged by anyone who feels like it. Why? The ruling is crystal clear. The right of prisoners to vote is framed and enshrined in law.
We are all familiar with people who make a conscious decision as to which laws they will comply with and which laws they won't. We call those people criminals.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk