King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Supreme Court to decide on compensation...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
veritas	I see the Court agreed that they should be compensated ( as 'victims' no doubt are) media still dictates the policies though.
veritas	and that is exactly what happened in the case I posted of the Catholic college head. Law firms and the police were allowed to post huge adverts seeking 'victims'..the police used that word as did law firms pointing out the compensation available. In a country town with huge unemployment- like an invitation.
JK2006	Until now most innocent victims of miscarriages of justice (Barry George; Sion Jenkins) were told they had to "prove" their innocence (an overturned conviction was not enough). Yet another example of the total reversal of the "innocent until proven guilty" approach. Now lawyers are trying to get the Supreme Court to admit that innocence is the norm and wrongly convicted victims should get compensation. It will be a travesty if it doesn't find this acceptable.