cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: The Ken Clarke 'controversy'
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Was it jounalists ?

... or "haven't got a clue" Millipede ?
Elizabeth Fribb-Nipple Doesn't it make the heart sink how journalists deliberately create these controversies just to feed their own professions? Any sane person would have realised Clarke wasn't implying what was claimed he was implying, and yet they all jumped on it, no doubt relishing all the pages and airtime it would sustain. So depressingly disingenuous.