cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Libya
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Solihull Exile JK2006 wrote:
Nobody doubted that the "rebels" backed by the air power and bombing facilities of the entire West would enable "regime change".

The questions are... should they have? And should we have contributed to it?

And will Gaddafi's replacement (judging by the length of time he's survived - a damn efficient leader) be any better? I'd bet - 100% no; here comes radical militant religious bigotry.


For any leader to survive there he'll need to be as strong and ruthless as Gadaffi!
JK2006 Nobody doubted that the "rebels" backed by the air power and bombing facilities of the entire West would enable "regime change".

The questions are... should they have? And should we have contributed to it?

And will Gaddafi's replacement (judging by the length of time he's survived - a damn efficient leader) be any better? I'd bet - 100% no; here comes radical militant religious bigotry.