Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: perhaps veritas can answer this ? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
veritas |
In The Know wrote:
veritas wrote:
as it would mean suddenly around £57million being taken out of the economy every week
No it wouldn't - we PUT IN that money to start with (its not free you know LOL !)
Yes it would. It's taxpayer's money being re-distributed to almost a million that you have identified (let alone all the others).
If it wasn't pumped back into the economy small business would plummet ( as would many others-utilities and so on).
In fact I was staggered to read how little unemployment payments are in Britain.
I have no idea how anyone survives on it.
This is really simple economics that even you should understand..afterall the Tories and (nu)Labour agree with me because they keep paying it !
you are alone on this one. |
GeminiUK |
Innocent Accused wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!
If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again ![](http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/components/com_kunena/template/default_ex/images/english/emoticons/grin-grey.png)
Rubbing out the result is never as effective as banishing the cause.
seems to me a single person's bad manners results in 99% of the problems here.I'd like to see more specialist debates here,not stupid utterances in support of the failed governmental system we have inherited. |
Innocent Accused |
JK2006 wrote:
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!
If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again |
Locked Out |
Fair enough, I trust you removed the suggestion that prompted my words too? |
JK2006 |
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory! |
|
|
|