cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: perhaps veritas can answer this ?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas In The Know wrote:
veritas wrote:
as it would mean suddenly around £57million being taken out of the economy every week

No it wouldn't - we PUT IN that money to start with (its not free you know LOL !)


Yes it would. It's taxpayer's money being re-distributed to almost a million that you have identified (let alone all the others).

If it wasn't pumped back into the economy small business would plummet ( as would many others-utilities and so on).

In fact I was staggered to read how little unemployment payments are in Britain.
I have no idea how anyone survives on it.

This is really simple economics that even you should understand..afterall the Tories and (nu)Labour agree with me because they keep paying it !

you are alone on this one.
GeminiUK Innocent Accused wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!

If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again


Rubbing out the result is never as effective as banishing the cause.
seems to me a single person's bad manners results in 99% of the problems here.I'd like to see more specialist debates here,not stupid utterances in support of the failed governmental system we have inherited.
Innocent Accused JK2006 wrote:
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!

If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again
Locked Out Fair enough, I trust you removed the suggestion that prompted my words too?
JK2006 Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!