Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Harriet Harman plays into the hands of ITK
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
veritas |
In The Know wrote:
veritas wrote:
and as I am descended from the same line that ITK says he is..
aren't many people descended from some fairly prominent line, veritas (if only they could prove it ?).
Most people cannot trace their lineage before 1835 (when civil registration began - although for the next 20 years it was a bit patchy) because they had no land, paid no tax, were not important people and therefor no record of them exists ?
Do the maths ....
obviously there are probably thousands but I can actually prove it (if records are true)..so I really should be on the throne especially as I would have been a benign dictator (got rid of parliament..dodgy set-up).
I may have..in true British royal tradition..got rid of a few troublesome relatives..I can think of one right now.  |
|
In The Know |
veritas wrote:
and as I am descended from the same line that ITK says he is..
aren't many people descended from some fairly prominent line, veritas (if only they could prove it ?).
Most people cannot trace their lineage before 1835 (when civil registration began - although for the next 20 years it was a bit patchy) because they had no land, paid no tax, were not important people and therefor no record of them exists ?
Do the maths .... |
|
Consent |
Locked Out wrote:
Your analysis of her as a "man hating feminist" is perhaps a little harsh {she is, after all, married to a man
Speechless. |
|
Innocent Accused |
veritas wrote:
and me !!..and as I am descended from the same line that ITK says he is..then it means that I, ITK and Harriet are all distant relatives.
Which means there is a fair chance that In The Know and I (and maybe others on here) are related to some of those 4 million scroungers.
which means of course : In The Know is a scrounger and part of the problem, not the solution. 
Kissing cousins then?  |
|
veritas |
Innocent Accused wrote:
In The Know wrote:
Innocent Accused wrote:
Labour 'does not back ANY spending cuts as they deny need for austerity measures'
Harriet Harman plays into the hands of ITK!!!
Don't worry, IA, I've got Harriet (or should I say Mrs Jack Dromey?) sussed !
SHE is the one that dropped women-only shortlists when her hubby wanted a "safe seat" and then re-introduced them as soon as he had been elected.
HE was Labour Party treasurer but failed to notice the money going into the account from the (ahem !) "donations" which led to the donor getting a peerage !
And to think she's related to Joseph Chamberlin 
and me !!..and as I am descended from the same line that ITK says he is..then it means that I, ITK and Harriet are all distant relatives.
Which means there is a fair chance that In The Know and I (and maybe others on here) are related to some of those 4 million scroungers.
which means of course : In The Know is a scrounger and part of the problem, not the solution. |
|
|
|
