IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: A simple question about this forum Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Blackit
Locked Out wrote: ..."a lower age of consent than our age of 16, which was randomly set by puritanical feminists in the late 19th century..."
Clearly your knowledge of how laws were conceived, framed and enacted in 1885 is very deep. So you will have no trouble in identifying the "puritanical feminists" you refer to. If that's either too long winded or
too much trouble, just two names would do. Or even one.
Incidentally I "accused you" {actually I only suggested that you may be suffering from them, but such a tiny thing as nuance appears to be beyond your comprehension} of having cognitive distortions only once, which is hardly "repeatedly". And the evidence I based that suggestion on has only been added to by your subsequent postings both here and on your other thread.
We have a built in preference for young healthy breeding stock material.However we also have culural influences that will affect our behaviour.Nature/Nurture.
Innocent Accused
angel wrote: Does my opinion not count?
A well spotted post about the young fooballer,that certainly counted
veritas
I admire beauty in all forms and I love young people (but don't want to sleep with them !)..I'm very puritan.
I can be very shallow in love though..I adore In The Know but next week I may hate him/her.
Of course the 'pedo behind every bush' brigade have made the admiration of young beauty a sin.