cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Burka/Niqab in France
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Quite right Pru and we are confronted by the truth; it is rarely if ever black and white; nearly always shades of grey.

By forcing democracy onto Arabs we may be constructing an inefficient and unhappy society for all; where a dictatorship often only means greater misery for some.
Prunella Minge Which takes one back to the tradtional Enlightenement liberal conundrum: if a slave is a happy slave, what do you do with logic and reason? Is a happy slave, or a slave who thinks he or she is happy, justification for defending slavery? Most French and Americans didn't want a revolution. Many downstairs servants were staunchly conservative about maintaining servitude. The majority of women in late 19th century/early 20th century Britain, according to research, were not eager to get the vote. It's not, and never has been, an easy issue.
JK2006 Well it's a bit like sex isn't it? If both parties want it fine. Forced - not fine. Likewise, women should be allowed to wear anything they want (as should men) as long as they are not forced to do so by others - be they husbands or religious leaders.
Prunella Minge It's a tricky problem. All of the great rights-based ideologies deriving from the 18th century - French liberty, American independence and feminism - were nurtured by the Enlightenment belief that reason delivers wisdom, and if you think rationally you'll all agree on what is right and wrong. So the moral power of these movements came from their conviction that what they said was true for all people in all places at all times. And Amnesty, liberalism, feminism etc still speak and act with that assumption of universal moral authority today. Yet they do so now in a world where we are also told to respect difference, diversity and subjectivity. So, frankly, the great old liberal ideology is in a bit of a pickle. The French are being more consistent, logical and, perhaps, honest in taking the position they've taken - but they're also more obviously compromised by the modern inclination towards relativism. Personally, on women's rights, I am happily old-fashioned and will remain a universalist - I'm not going to excuse signs of patriarchy by pretending it's a fashion statement.
JK2006 My favourite Arab postcard is of a beautiful woman in a blue niqab with the most gorgeous eyes. It is strange that sometimes this can enhance, not lessen, inner beauty. Mind you, it is odd that she is wearing eye makeup to increase her beauty.

Many friends have received this card in the post from me after one of my North African trips.