cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Sherlock - too clever; too cryptic; too contrived
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Prunella Minge I just don't get the conceit of updating it. The whole point of Conan Doyle's stories was his detective was a symbol of Enlightenment reasoning in an era of pre-Enlightenment speculative policing. Bringing that into an era of rationalist-driven policing (yes, yes, still crap, but anyway) undermines the fiction. Everyone's a Sherlock these days.
JK2006 Everyone seems to love it; I ended up thinking Stephen Moffatt is no Russell T Davies.