Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Remember ..... not ALL allegations are false !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
andrew |
I don't blame the jury all the time they are not given the full truth. |
|
Blackit |
The legal terminology used in sexual offences has been perverted and manipulated so much that it's impossible from the reports to determine how harshly we should be judging him (assuming he is really guilty of the offences).
For example, 'making indecent images of children' can refer to either idly clicking upon a youtube video thumbnail of a 17 year old girl dancing sexily that might appear next to the video you've been watching of an adult woman dancing. Or else it could mean that he was actually taking nude pictures of toddlers.
It also states that the child porn images were 'levels 1 - 4' with level 5 being most serious. Well a picture of a 20 year old woman having sex in a school uniform is classified as level 4 child porn. Naked pictures of toddlers posed in sexual positions are merely level 1.
Similarly, 'indecent assault' could mean that he groped a few 15 year old teenagers with their 'consent', and only now have they decided that they were abused. 'Rape of a child' is a blanket term that covers the actual rape of babies to 12 year old girls having willing sex with anyone over 16.
Of course, this lack of clarity doesn't prevent the neanderthals underneath the article calling for him to be disembowelled by his fellow inmates - in other words, incitement to murder. |
|
In The Know |
JK2006 wrote:
And not ALL pleas of Guilty mean guilt.
When I posted I expected this response ... and also expected it from JK !
He's absolutely right, of course. |
|
Innocent Accused |
Evo wrote:
I have allways thought that the audio recordings the police make when interviewing someone is a highly suspect practise as with a bit of jiggery pokery they could make you say absolutely anything on the recording
It's the bits before and after where the damage can be done.Also remember America is a little different to us. |
|
Evo |
I have allways thought that the audio recordings the police make when interviewing someone is a highly suspect practise as with a bit of jiggery pokery they could make you say absolutely anything on the recording |
|
|
|
