IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: ITK supports the Church in opposing gay "marriage" Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
veritas
angel wrote: Most gays couldn't care one jot. Whats wrong with civil partnership? Marriage is historically for the purpose of pro-creation. Whats wrong with trying to protect that? The'll be wanting designated parking spaces next!
I couldn't give a damn who gets married..male-male/female-female/male-female...pussycat-dog/ male-goat etc etc..
..and I have my own designated parking spot from when I had a knee replacement..2 years to run ..I have to hobble for a block when I park the car right outside theatres, train stations..at the door of Westfield etc..don't tell the Daily Mail though ( I's like a disability pension as well )
In The Know
angel wrote: The'll be wanting designated parking spaces next!
You mean they don't already have gender-friendly unisex parking spaces ????!!!!??
IA
angel wrote: Most gays couldn't care one jot. Whats wrong with civil partnership? Marriage is historically for the purpose of pro-creation. Whats wrong with trying to protect that? The'll be wanting designated parking spaces next!
Well said Angel,wish I had my own parking space though.
angel
Most gays couldn't care one jot. Whats wrong with civil partnership? Marriage is historically for the purpose of pro-creation. Whats wrong with trying to protect that? The'll be wanting designated parking spaces next!
david
I thought the Question Time debate was refreshing and at times entertaining.
Will Young was a bit wobbly to start with but really got going and got the best laugh. Another surprise favourite was ...... Eric Pickles