cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: ECHR - ruling seems correct to me
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
steveimp You forget though JK, we are the 'free' West, we never lie to, cheat or abuse other people or indeed or own peoples!
JK2006 And I must say - 8 years in prison without trial strikes me as absolutely absurd and illegal.
I seem to remember something called the Magna Carta banned that sort of thing?
It would never have happened in Libya, Syria, Egypt... or would it?
JK2006 Domenic Raab spoke great sense about this on BBC Brekkie - this ruling is correct (wrong applications) but our extradition laws are totally wrong too and need repairing.
JK2006 I think the lawyers went down the wrong paths with their appeals. Abu Hamza may indeed be a bad person (I think any religious reason for killing people is bad - in fact, most negative religious "reasons" for anything are bad). But the law, as Mr Bumble once famously and correctly pronounced in a simple yet accurate reply written by the greatest man who ever lived - "The Law is an ass".