cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Kate Fisher
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda What they are saying is nonsense.

Pedos would have been targeting their perverted desire since time immemorial.

What they mean is more people are being arrested for it but the whole announcement was full of fear factors like the idiotic claim that kiddie porn consumers are now likely to physically assault while psychiatrists say the opposite is true.

The bovver boys in blue also said this should be taken into account when sentencing. An outrageous statement that should have parliamentarians howling but was met with silence.

And you though Minority Report was science fiction.

But what about the CEOP officers who fearlessly view kiddiE porn, and therefore by their own claim, abuse victims further?.
In fact can we deduce that officers may deliberately go into CEOP with a desire to view porn and pretend to be kids online seducing adult pervs?

anyone claiming to be a CEOP 'analyst' needs analysing.
Steph Pumpkinhead wrote:
a principal analyst at CEOP, has announced that 'paedophiles' are targeting "increasingly younger children"

This is true.

But your overall comments are out of context.

The first point does not follow the second.
andrew This what the media do the make the impossible possible.
Pumpkinhead I'm 16 and for most of my life I have heard, from various sources, that 'paedophiles' have been abusing very young children, even babies, for decades.

Now I read that Kate Fisher, a principal analyst at CEOP, has announced that 'paedophiles' are targeting "increasingly younger children".

How can they be younger than babies?

Stupid emotional statements from officials really annoy me.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-...edophiles-probe.html