cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Sex offenders face mandatory lie detector tests
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
steveimp Even Jeremy Kyle says his lie detectors are between 95 and 99% correct. To me the chance of 1 to 5 out of 100 being incorrect is far too high.
Pattaya Honesty doesn't get you compensation!
FullFacts Routine lie-detect tests for routinely LYING cops anyone ?
Hedda Hopper idiotic idea and as soon as "sex offenders" learn to monitor their heart rate to defeat the machine..easy.. it will end in tears.\

wankers indeed.
JK2006 Thank you for this SE - I begged to take a Lie Detector Test but was told they were so unreliable they would not be allowed as evidence in court.

Has the technology changed? Or just the morality? Or are they STILL not allowed in court, in which case is this just another government/media smokescreen to make it look as though they are doing something where they are simply grabbing tabloid headlines?

I know what I guess.

Wankers.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk