cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Rape DNA "not adequate"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Hedda wrote:
I've always thought DNA was a two-edged sword.

www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html?_r=0
Hedda I've always thought DNA was a two-edged sword.

fingerprints aren't reliable either but everyone believes all those cop shows like CSI etc.
In The Know Forensic procedures carried out by a private firm which wrongly linked the DNA of a man to a rape were "not adequate", a report says.

Adam Scott, from Devon, was held for a couple of months after being accused of raping a woman in Manchester.

The charges were dropped when it emerged a DNA sample had been contaminated at LGC Forensics.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19782917

How many people STILL believe that DNA is infallible?