King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Those Esther Rantzen rumours?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Hedda	seems I was wrong (laws are different in various countries): No law says you have to report a crime to the police or give evidence. But remember, by coming forward you could bring a criminal to justice. You could also stop the same thing happening to others. You can contact Victim Support, a charity that helps victims and witnesses, or other organisations for advice. Esther, by not reporting these (alleged) crimes didn't stop 'the same thing happening to others'. perhaps she contacted her own organisation and she consoled herself.
Hedda	Foz wrote: Hedda wrote: Just Me wrote: Someone on ds having a rant about this topic, lol if JK's opinions annoy them so much why read these forums? forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1740554 and most responses are supportive and others point out that Esther Ranzten (and Gambo) basically ignored child abuse..why ?..because of their careers. I really have a very strange feeling that the wheels are going to come off this charanbanc and many people will have egg on their faces. Private Eye quite rightly pointed out that Esther Rantzen was having an affair/married to one of the top BBC executives at the time (Wilcox) so surely her excuse about her career being threatened by whistle-blowing was null and void? But whether she was having an affair or not is basically irrelevant. If she knew (and if it's true) she was part of the cover-up. Did she say nothing just so she could keep a job?. If so she is guilty of a crime.
Gary	I dont understand it, why didnt they accuse jim saville when he was here, hes dead now and he cant defend himself, and i dont think its fair to accuse someone when their dead, I admire you johnathan for trying and trying to clear your name as I belive you are innocent to, Gary In Oldham uk
Foz	Hedda wrote: Just Me wrote: Someone on ds having a rant about this topic, lol if JK's opinions annoy them so much why read these forums? forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1740554 and most responses are supportive and others point out that Esther Ranzten (and Gambo) basically ignored child abuse..why ?..because of their careers. I really have a very strange feeling that the wheels are going to come off this charanbanc and many people will have egg on their faces. Private Eye quite rightly pointed out that Esther Rantzen was having an affair/married to one of the top BBC executives at the time (Wilcox) so surely her excuse about her career being threatened by whistle-blowing was null and void?
Hedda	Just Me wrote: Someone on ds having a rant about this topic, lol if JK's opinions annoy them so much why read these forums? forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1740554 and most responses are supportive and others point out that Esther Ranzten (and Gambo) basically ignored child abuse..why ?..because of their careers. I really have a very strange feeling that the wheels are going to come off this charanbanc and many people will have egg on their faces.