cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: We're not allowed to know our future King's thoughts
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Hedda the Monarchist I have no real interest in what he wrote as I'm sure it was probably most mundane and uninteresting.

In honesty there should be no such thing as a monarchy..it's a disgraceful concept but in reality the alternative is President Blair (urghhh) and what would all those tourists do in London ?
steveimp People point to a possible 'President Blair' as a con for Republicanism.

I point to the possible Prince Chas as a con for Monarchy.
The Astrological Twin www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19959233

The court ruled the letters should be published, AG says they shouldn't.