cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: how newspapers lie through their rotten teeth
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Also most interesting that the soldier DID break the law by bringing in a weapon, and DID have 380 rounds of ammo.

So, why has the appeal been allowed?

The Daily Mail may be right ... one law for the majority and another for those who are adopted by the media (because they are "our boys")
Hedda The most ghastly (and often enjoyable ) Daily Mail is crowing today because a soldier got released from jail.

They are screeching that somehow they were responsible. They didn't do a frigging thing to bring about the verdict.

The soldier's lawyers appealed the decision, presented their arguments and the appeal judges agreed on points of law and released him.

End of story.

If they lie about this, what else?