Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: surely this should be investigated?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
bh |
I do agree. Considering it's no secret that GG is intellectually backward. Illiterate in the 60s (whether he learn to read & write properly, we don't know for sure). Indeed that too, would stunt his case.
Watching his This Is Your Life, he comes across as a bit of an old softy, too.
Given the facts, it's a big certainty he was taken for a ride, in more ways than one.
Unfortunayely (just like the JS hype) the public can't see it.
A further basis, if he were as bad as portrade, then where are the tons of girls, that could of sais similar in the 70s? We've not heard from any, except the dodgy story from a 16 year old, claiming to be 14. |
|
hedda |
bh wrote:
Just thinking if Glitter was found guilty of dowmloading obscene pictures...What about the site they came from? Were the owners also prosecuted? Probably not. In which case is it not illegal run such a site?
of course it is and even viewing them is a crime. Tosspot has undoubtedly committed that crime with his great twitter discovery for a tabloid when he claimed he encountered pedos posting sick pix.
He also advises others who inadvertently view kiddie porn on twitter and elsewhere to inform police- in other words go to the cop shop and say "hey I committed a crime like Tosspot and viewed child porn..what should I do?"
GG claimed he had viewed around 10 pics and deleted them..not being computer savvy perhaps he didn't realise they were still cached...the computer shop claimed they found 3/4000. How do we know the computer technician didn't place them there?
I believe if GG believed what he said he should have pleaded Not Guilty and fought the case better...but he was weighed down by an assault charge organised by a tabloid and probably worn down by the whole thing.
His treatment since will go down in history as a travesty of the state brutalising one man at the behest of a newspaper.
It has been bizarrely brutal and vicious including endless insults about his looks and career--mainly by the same tabloids who made money by promoting him in their pages. Just as they did with Jimmy Savile. |
|
bh |
Just thinking if Glitter was found guilty of dowmloading obscene pictures...What about the site they came from? Were the owners also prosecuted? Probably not. In which case is it not illegal run such a site? |
|
bh |
I don't reckon anyone will be charged either. Most of all I think that there isn't a case for Jimmy Savile, either. Only wish the fella was still alive, to blow it all apart...but then if he were alive, then this Kettle of bullshit, would never of boiled up, anyway.
One person is responsible for this hyped up tosh & that person is a certain retired dicky dick. |
|
WorldView |
If any mainstream-mug even dreamed they could top Hedda-ROCKS !
They'd better wake up and apologise. |
|
|
|
