Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: this is what will happen to Jimmy Savile's estate
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
In The Know wrote:
hedda wrote:
I would venture that not one claimant is legally entitled to a penny including those who make 'successful' claims because (on my limited understanding of having been a trustee twice)..the moment Savile died his estate automatically belonged to his inheritors.
The COMPO claims are in !!!!
BBC and Savile estate both sued.
news.sky.com/story/1051668/bbc-and-savil...-sued-by-sex-victims
sad really as he left most of it to charity. |
|
In The Know |
hedda wrote:
I would venture that not one claimant is legally entitled to a penny including those who make 'successful' claims because (on my limited understanding of having been a trustee twice)..the moment Savile died his estate automatically belonged to his inheritors.
The COMPO claims are in !!!!
BBC and Savile estate both sued.
news.sky.com/story/1051668/bbc-and-savil...-sued-by-sex-victims |
|
bh |
hedda wrote:
I don't particularly like kids and avoid them like the plague with their sticky hands and screeching voices.
Presumably a pedo must like being around them. Savile must have been the exception to the rule. 
Yep. The whole reason that the complete story is a load of lies & rubbish. |
|
hedda |
I don't particularly like kids and avoid them like the plague with their sticky hands and screeching voices.
Presumably a pedo must like being around them. Savile must have been the exception to the rule. |
|
bh |
hedda wrote:
Ben 9 wrote:
hedda wrote:
after an estate has been distributed
This is the relevant point/word - 'after'. If the estate had been settled/distributed, no claim would be possible against; it wouldn't exist.
But it hasn't - its frozen. So, claims can be made - as they can against any legal entity, that exists.
yes that is because there must be cut-off points in law otherwise there would be chaos...and death is most certainly the final cut-off point.
After death it is just processes to get the job done, probate etc. The reason you have a day published stating claims will be no longer accepted is because inheritors must get what they are due and the money will be gone after that date.
Hence my proposition (from limited experience) is that under law, I say that Savile's estate at death was in name only. The estate belonged to those he left it to.
However the law is always dodgy and ways can be found to challenge what may seem clear cut.
Also Nat West as trustees have a legal obligation to defend claims against an estate if the claim is questionable which it will be in this case. Hence- with about 3 Mill quid..it will be gone after a few years.
Personally, those attacking his estate are creeps as the money was left to charity apart from a few small legacies.
They would be better off suing the BBC, The government, Paul Gambiccini (who knew Savile raped dead bodies but kept quiet) the tax avoider ITK and everyone else except me.
Yeah Paul Gambaimbicile...Coincidently Savile didn't like Homosexuals, as it 'appens. No, coincidence at all don't we think?! He also hated kids & cults. All 3 are the connections, that have ruined his name, just to get back at the man. |
|
|
|
