cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Pollard and Rippon
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Some absolutely brilliant points in the Meirion Jones thread - by posters who have read his evidence. Conflicting with the media coverage by people who don't seem to have done so.

My take since reading the transcript.

Jones and MWT desperately wanted the Savile claims to be true (for whatever reasons - we don't know enough to judge motive).

Peter Rippon saw this and felt - objectively - that the claims might have been false. He decided the investigation should be dropped. Whether or not it should have been continued before a decision on transmission was made was entirely up to him and his judgement.

What I find deeply troubling is that, after reading the transcripts, certain sections of the media are still condemning him (and Entwistle, Patten and others not connected at all)... it reeks of dodgy intentions.

Pollard should have said clearly, in capital letters, and repeated... Peter Rippon was not to blame.