King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Leeds Hospital/Jimmy Savile
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.	I thought it was very strange how when Michael Barrymore suggested that Stuart Lubbock's body was sexually attacked at the hospital everyone said it was ludicrous, then Jimmy Savile was "revealed" to have run amok in mortuaries for years on end and it was accepted without question.
Anonymous	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: JK2006 wrote: Is it just me who has noticed Leeds Hospital seems to be in the news for all the wrong reasons - yet wasn't it doing fine when Jimmy Savile worked there? And wasn't the millions he left to them blocked by "abused victims"? And might that dedication have helped Leeds Hospital save those lives now lost? Or am I wrong to see these things? Nope. Anyone who takes money from a charity to compensate themselves for something that they have managed to live with for forty years isn't quite right in the head. The whole thing has been about compensation and other agendas from the start, thats obvious from the BBC Panorama programme "what the BBC knew"...
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Is it just me who has noticed Leeds Hospital seems to be in the news for all the wrong reasons - yet wasn't it doing fine when Jimmy Savile worked there? And wasn't the millions he left to them blocked by "abused victims"? And might that dedication have helped Leeds Hospital save those lives now lost? Or am I wrong to see these things? Nope. Anyone who takes money from a charity to compensate themselves for something that they have managed to live with for forty years isn't quite right in the head.
JK2006	Is it just me who has noticed Leeds Hospital seems to be in the news for all the wrong reasons - yet wasn't it doing fine when Jimmy Savile worked there? And wasn't the millions he left to them blocked by "abused victims"? And might that dedication have helped Leeds Hospital save those lives now lost? Or am I wrong to see these things?