Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Barry George case
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Big End |
far too many doubts to be certain "beyond all reasonable doubt". Why is the very corner stone of the criminal conviction criteria overlooked? And I cannot believe in a conviction based on hearsay and/or tabloid emotivism. |
|
Why so coy? |
It was in the papers that there was a plausible Serbian connection to the murder:
www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,749126,00.html |
|
She Knows You Know |
can be discovered by a conversation with a man called Jamie Shea.
Brussels.
May 12th 1999. |
|
JK2006 |
I can assure you I am totally innocent of the convictions against me; one of which was for a crime allegedly committed when I was on another continent.
The appeal process continues.
But I must tell you, the old raised eyebrow about "everyone claims to be innocent" is getting short shrift in prison these days where more and more decent men and women who work with inmates - officers, governors, staff, chaplains, medical teams - are becoming certain that many incarcerated people are victims and not perpetrators.
Another example; Michael Stone.
NOBODY makes a cell confession through a pipe in the wall.
Nobody. |
|
The Cat |
I have said the same thing about Roy Whiting. * Sole eye witness description did not match man or vehicle. * Only physical evidence was shown to be contaminated in property room. But the guy had 'previous' so he must be guilty. I have no personal knowledge of whether he was guilty or not, but the case was most certainly not proven.
Several others cases raise questions also. Not least JK's. |
|
|
|
