King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: media lowlifes
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.	hedda wrote: headline now changed after several emails to the online editor from Hedda : Rolf Harris' family and friends rally as TV channel pulls shows hedda rules !! Go Hedda! I think they might have accidentally employed someone who reads the complaints. I have spent years hounding them about the ridiculous eating disorder stories and photos they churn out (I help run a voluntary support group for carers and sufferers) and all of a sudden they have listened and changed it.
JK2006	Well done Hedda. Guerilla warfare; doncha jes luv it?
hedda	headline now changed after several emails to the online editor from Hedda : Rolf Harris' family and friends rally as TV channel pulls shows hedda rules !!
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: And another point to back up the one you're making Hedda; isn't it truly disturbing that now virtually everyone describes Jimmy Savile as guilty whereas he was, is and remains technically innocent unless and until proven guilty? It appears mere semantics; I challenge that; I think it's seriously lazy thinking and actually criminal behaviour (certainly would be if he were alive; I wonder how a law suit against those libelling a dead man would fare?). It could perhaps be excused if there had been a crime committed with several witnesses but in the case of Jimmy Savile I still haven't seen any real evidence to support the claims, and some of them are quite ridiculous. It looks as if you CAN fool all the people all of the time after all!
JK2006	And another point to back up the one you're making Hedda; isn't it truly disturbing that now virtually everyone describes Jimmy Savile as guilty whereas he was, is and remains technically innocent unless and until proven guilty? It appears mere semantics; I challenge that; I think it's seriously lazy thinking and actually criminal behaviour (certainly would be if he were alive; I wonder how a law suit against those libelling a dead man would fare?).