Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Freddie Starr
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
bh |
Quite right. Ageing celebrities? Are they a current danger? More dangerous than a potential terrorist aka those that killed that poor soldier t'other week? Or is it that ageing celebrities, make better news stories & have their careers destroyed, whether innocent or guilty?
Freddie Starr - A dangerous sexbeast? I think not. An egotistical arsehole, yes.
"The Police didn't get Savile. So, they are going for the next biggest thing". Hilarious on it's own. Is it the funniest thing that Starr's ever said?! |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
Is there any reason why the police cant do the bulk of evidence before they arrest someone? |
|
Pattaya |
Chris Retro wrote:
20 months maximum sentence for historical groping vs uncharged eternal bail.
But far be it for me to suggest the bent Metropolitan Police are having their cake and eat it to feed a population of retards.
Well put Chris,just how long should be needed to investigate a few aging slappers after compo and fame? |
|
Chris Retro |
20 months maximum sentence for historical groping vs uncharged eternal bail.
But far be it for me to suggest the bent Metropolitan Police are having their cake and eat it to feed a population of retards. |
|
BarntheBarn |
Ben 8 wrote:
BarntheBarn wrote:
Either they have evidence of crimes committed or not!
Is it not proper that any such evidence is carefully examined and investigated?
Of course it is but I would assume (wrongly of course) that being arrested meant there was a lot of evidence of a crime. I my most recent dealings with police I was not arrested, I attended a voluntary interview and within an hour was informed no case to be filed. I just don't think potentially innocent people should have their lives ruined even more than the fact they were even accused will already do. |
|
|
|
