Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Andrew Lancel found not guilty
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
imo |
JK2006 wrote:
I like that Chris.
I do wonder how Lancel was clearly allowed to remove false claims with incorrect dates when the prosecution in my case was allowed to change the dates AFTER my defence had been completed, without my being allowed one single second to discover alternative alibis for the changed dates (and I have subsequently found I was on a different continent).
Absolutely shocking, and if you did have time to discover that alibi, do you think they'd have just been allowed to change the dates yet again?  |
|
hedda |
I'm having an ongoing drama with a (former I think) friend over the Catholic Church in Australia currently under the spotlight.
She is collating the 'victim's ' tales and if I dare ask how she knows they are all victims all hell breaks loose. I get the full treatment..."victims must be believed " etc etc and yet we have a mutual friend who has admitted to me he claimed and got compo saying a jailed priest had abused him...on the justification the priest had been jailed for abusing 6 others, what difference did one more make?
This woman has shown a new very ugly side of herself to me...it is very frightening and she is almost demonic especially if I dare question the prescribed narrative : all priests, nay very nun and Catholic worker is part of a perverted mafia like entity and are all guilty buy association.
Salem is a live and well and if I disappear one day you know bundles of fags have been assembled around my feet or I have become a victim of the dunking stool.  |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
JK2006 wrote:
I like that Chris.
I do wonder how Lancel was clearly allowed to remove false claims with incorrect dates when the prosecution in my case was allowed to change the dates AFTER my defence had been completed, without my being allowed one single second to discover alternative alibis for the changed dates (and I have subsequently found I was on a different continent).
The way its going with the definition of abuse changing every five minutes and including touching of hair and face, being on another continent will be no defence at all. After all, you might have THOUGHT about the accuser!  |
|
JK2006 |
I like that Chris.
I do wonder how Lancel was clearly allowed to remove false claims with incorrect dates when the prosecution in my case was allowed to change the dates AFTER my defence had been completed, without my being allowed one single second to discover alternative alibis for the changed dates (and I have subsequently found I was on a different continent). |
|
Chris Retro |
Perhaps Judge Fudge forgot he was dealing with Trained Actors?
Maybe he thought 'acting in court' is the preserve of bewigged counsel? |
|
|
|
