cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Monarchies - check out Belgium
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Pumpkinhead It was the last Belgium King who find himself in sole command of the country when the entire government resigned in recent years. Some nationals said he should have carried on and abolished parliament (a bit like Cromwell did).

JK keeps saying that democracy doesn't work.
Ben 7 Only the King of Thailand - Rama IX - has reigned longer than the Queen; he is almost the exact same age.

Still quite active, though with some health problems, he is deemed - with our Queen - to be the richest sovereign in the world. c$35b.

Also married to the same wife/consort since his coronation in 1950 - he is the oldest living recipient of the Royal Victorian Chain; Prince Philip is one of the 13 others who are living.

Like our Queen, he has no plans to retire - although, again, there is a son, ready and willing to take over.



JK2006 I generally approve of monarchies - if they are virtually powerless. Our Royal Family is terrific and the Queen and Philip extraordinary.