cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Tipsheet Messageboard
Post a new message in "Tipsheet Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: as you are quite aware, Jonathan, there is a huge gulf between disapproving of the indecent assault of 14-year-old boys and homophobia
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 And as you well know Badger, the lyric condemns sex with anyone under age quite clearly.

And so do I, now they have equalised the ages of consent.

Remember my appeal against my wrongful conviction is ongoing.

If you mean that "boys" means under age and so does "girls" that is a point of view. But one not shared by normal people or dictionaries or the law.

OUR BOYS, so beloved of the tabloids, must be very young indeed.
badgerbadgerbadger Your deliberate attempt to muddy the one with the other is what is so reprehensible.

It is offensive not only to those who try and protect children from these sorts of attacks, but the entire gay community (who would be homophobic themselves by your standards).