cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Tipsheet Messageboard
Post a new message in "Tipsheet Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Do check this before they change it!
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 8.30pm; 267 people have seen this yet the BBC still haven't changed it; the new No1 is still going down the chart.

Nobody cares anymore.
dixie JK2006 wrote:
Brain dead BBC and OCC and music industry; they are SO confused by the current music scene that And and Dec's brand new hit has DROPPED to No1 and been on the singles chart for 16 weeks!

www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/update/singles


I doubt it's anything to do with OCC. Weeks on chart is based on previous entries. (Though the number might be incorrect).
Chris Retro I've nothing against the PJ & Duncan records - indeed, I could name them all and only a couple (OUR Radio Rocks! for instance) were awful - but they were brushing shoulders in the charts with the the Britpop cocktail, loads of joyous dance music as well as other varied acts from Celine Dion & the Bee Gees to The Beautiful South & REM.
Now the singles chart is full of sub-PJ & Duncan pap-pop normally originating from reality television & joyless dance music. The variety has been eradicated.
JK2006 I was asked to produce them years ago by Matthew Robinson (Tom's older brother and a fellow Cambridge student with me) but declined.
Chris Retro Question is - if PJ & Duncan were sort of 'the worst of 1994' in terms of quality, what would happen if something 'good' was promoted on TV now? Revelation? Or is a "90s Revival" in full flow - the "90s" meaning all of those heavily manufactured acts on 'The Big Reunion', suggesting what I've suggested elsewhere in a burying of 'good' pop culture to present the past as much the same as today? What next - a Deuce revival? The mid-late 90s were the point when "pop music" was deliberately divorced from what pop music had been in the 60s, 70s & 80 (ie creative & intelligent)?