IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: Why pay for TV license
|
|
Why pay for TV license 11 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
I was at who hold the rights to broadcast live sport on TV it's surprising how very little is shown on BBC the way they advertised you think they show lots.
Contract for Wimbledon expires next year and heavily rumored BT, Sky and ITV want to bid for it, if BBC lose it I would not mind as it won't mess up schedules, snooker on BBC is getting worse they tell viewers to switch over to red button but when it's Wimbledon they let the game continue.
Rugby games are always blurry on BBC Sky is crystal clear, Football Focus and Final Score is embarrassing with it's lame pundits, Gobby sorry Gabby Logan is boring and the voice that grates young ears, Soccer Saturday cannot be beat excellent pundits hilarious mishaps and insults left right and centre.
BBC got rid of all cricket to Sky which is bad as many kids know do not know how to play the game nor do you see kids play it anymore. ITV4 have excellent coverage on IPL T20 and hope to keep the contract going and also have plans for BPL in the near future which is on Channel 9 currently but not everyone has Freesat.
Now there is hardly any sport on BBC MOTD is ok but doesn't always do justice time streamline some pundits, what do we pay for apart from biased news, endless repeats which cost nothing to endless and why have news on BBC1 when they have a news channel ?
They already trained their news staff for when the Queen dies as they thought it was embrassing to see Peter Sissons in a grey suit and tie he still looked smart and professional, I didn't wear black suit or tie when my mum died.
If BBC did a encryption service when it's PPV how many members of the public will subscribe, who would watch it ?
I rather BBC adverts than pay for the drivel they show.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Why pay for TV license 11 Years, 10 Months ago
|
|
With one in ten of ALL UK court cases taken up with prosecution for non payment we really do need to seek an alternative.
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/b...-UK-court-cases.html
I am very concerned that some of their major productions would suffer if left to the whims of the moronic population
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Why pay for TV license 11 Years, 7 Months ago
|
|
andrew wrote:
I was at who hold the rights to broadcast live sport on TV it's surprising how very little is shown on BBC the way they advertised you think they show lots.
Contract for Wimbledon expires next year and heavily rumored BT, Sky and ITV want to bid for it, if BBC lose it I would not mind as it won't mess up schedules, snooker on BBC is getting worse they tell viewers to switch over to red button but when it's Wimbledon they let the game continue.
Rugby games are always blurry on BBC Sky is crystal clear, Football Focus and Final Score is embarrassing with it's lame pundits, Gobby sorry Gabby Logan is boring and the voice that grates young ears, Soccer Saturday cannot be beat excellent pundits hilarious mishaps and insults left right and centre.
BBC got rid of all cricket to Sky which is bad as many kids know do not know how to play the game nor do you see kids play it anymore. ITV4 have excellent coverage on IPL T20 and hope to keep the contract going and also have plans for BPL in the near future which is on Channel 9 currently but not everyone has Freesat.
Now there is hardly any sport on BBC MOTD is ok but doesn't always do justice time streamline some pundits, what do we pay for apart from biased news, endless repeats which cost nothing to endless and why have news on BBC1 when they have a news channel ?
They already trained their news staff for when the Queen dies as they thought it was embrassing to see Peter Sissons in a grey suit and tie he still looked smart and professional, I didn't wear black suit or tie when my mum died.
If BBC did a encryption service when it's PPV how many members of the public will subscribe, who would watch it ?
I rather BBC adverts than pay for the drivel they show.
Sky show just about all sport, I think. Do you get that?
Otherwise you might as well save the money by ditching the television and watching repeats online.
I am the opposite. I would rather they showed no sport at all, but as long as they show a bit of something for everyone that's fair enough.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|