ITK's views on the Paralympics/disabled athletes are well known on this site.

('Mongs' etc...)

Has he sold his material to Jim Davidson?


www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jim-davids...-jokes-aimed-2214146

It just shows how wonderful we really are- defending this odious oaf even when he is falsely accused.

Jim was telling bad taste jokes like that long before ITK turned up.
The difference is to Jim anything is fair game,especially himself,ITK actually believes his own press.
That said ITK is the secret ingredient that keeps this board interesting.Take him away and even Hedda/Veritas/Mart misses him/

I heard he know longer sells out venues which is good and banned from Marlowe Theatre.

Some (most) of the things he says are horrible but I thought exactly the same about the cyclist. The paralympics should be as fair as the able bodied section is.

andrew wrote:
I heard he know longer sells out venues which is good and banned from Marlowe Theatre.

ITK...or Jim?

st. hedda wrote:
this odious oaf

Ok ITK is an old bigot - but that's a bit harsh, hedda

I'm sure ITK is the Grand Wizard of Sussex.

Jim and ITK should be an item.

let's ban ITK from Marlow Theatre. It's a start.

ah, the badger .... an odd, nasty little creature. Its a weasel you know (literally !)
Riddled with disease, allegedly. I was against the cull but am turning in favour !

Long pointed noses (that they like to shove into other people's business) - no surprise then that people want them culled.

I'm told they make good "pets" and will always (usually within 10 minutes !!) come to the aid of a friend who has been injured on the road (or on a message board).

They are quite generous too ... and often share the same IP address with their friends.

However, their grammar is utterly appalling, and they often speak about subjects that they know little about (how could they know anything? They live in the dark !)

Not black and not white ...
neither one thing nor the other ...
no wonder they are always so totally confused !

I'm partially on ITK's side about paralympic sport.

Some of the events seem more like a test of who's least disabled than a comparison of athletic achievement.

Then again, I was very impressed by some of the blind Brazilian footballers. Their skill would be equally astonishing on Match of the Day.

st. hedda wrote:
It just shows how wonderful we really are- defending this odious oaf even when he is falsely accused.

"Even"???

Tuppenceworth wrote:
I'm partially on ITK's side about paralympic sport.

Some of the events seem more like a test of who's least disabled than a comparison of athletic achievement.

Then again, I was very impressed by some of the blind Brazilian footballers. Their skill would be equally astonishing on Match of the Day.

It seemed that those who could afford the swishest legs or the fastest wheelchair had a huge advantage,and I found it obscene to be celebrating the technology of mobility aids when so many are denied them.
I would sooner have scrapped the games and used the money to give everyone the very best mobility aids instead.