Clare Short !

More "woolly" thinking ...
More "cloud cuckoo land" rhetoric !

She's says we should wait - how long?
We've already been inactive for 2.5 years (causing 100,000 deaths and 2 million displaced).

The Syrian regime HAS chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think used them ?
The Syrian regime HAS rockets to deliver chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think fired them ? DOH !

She seeks to fuse Syria with Iraq (one - Bush's invasion, clearly illegal ... the other, providing humanitarian support, clearly lawful and desirable).

These people are highly dangerous - and the terror regimes (Syria / Korea etc) will run rings around them.

No wonder they are called Loonies !!!

A great constituency MP for the Birmingham area.
She warned against Iraq,while crazy Cons and Looooney Libs fell for the lies of the US....oh and didn't Russia and China also not fall for Iraq?

Pattaya wrote:
and Looooney Libs fell for the lies of the US...

do you not remember the principled anti-war stance of the Libs ????

Pattaya wrote:
while crazy Cons and Looooney Libs fell for the lies of the US....


... and I thought it was B-Lair and the loony Nooo Labour Party that took us to war LOL !

In The Know wrote:
Pattaya wrote:
while crazy Cons and Looooney Libs fell for the lies of the US....


... and I thought it was B-Lair and the loony Nooo Labour Party that took us to war LOL !

Most of the Cons backed it,including Dave.Just proves how easily he can be fooled.

blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1...ria-hes-in-the-soup/

'Cameron considered voting against military action, although in the end he went along with it'

Can't even wait for an inquiry.As an ex military man it does worry me how an idiot like this can put Britain's at risk.

In The Know wrote:
Clare Short !

More "woolly" thinking ...
More "cloud cuckoo land" rhetoric !

She's says we should wait - how long?
We've already been inactive for 2.5 years (causing 100,000 deaths and 2 million displaced).

The Syrian regime HAS chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think used them ?
The Syrian regime HAS rockets to deliver chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think fired them ? DOH !

She seeks to fuse Syria with Iraq (one - Bush's invasion, clearly illegal ... the other, providing humanitarian support, clearly lawful and desirable).

These people are highly dangerous - and the terror regimes (Syria / Korea etc) will run rings around them.

No wonder they are called Loonies !!!

Do you have any proof to support your allegations that Syria has chemical weapons?

Clare was spectacularly right about Iraq.

personally, anything claimed by US presidents, I think the opposite.

Pattaya wrote:
Most of the Cons backed it,including Dave.Just proves how easily he can be fooled.

To be fair ... people OUGHT to have a right to believe our PM - especially over matters so serious.

Cameron would NOT have seen the evidence - just heard the pledges / promises made by our (then) Prime Minister.

I wonder why people call him B-Liar ?????

Angel wrote:
Do you have any proof to support your allegations that Syria has chemical weapons?

No - only Assad's never ending attempts to "hide and conceal" things. Why would he need to do that?

He allowed the UN to inspect - eventually (after the evidence had dissipated !)

You will remember, angel, my (principled !) stand AGAINST the Iraq war - I knew I was right - and I was.

I am just as convinced on this issue.

If it looks like a rat, acts like a rat, smells like a rat, and behaves like a rat - then it almost certainly a rat !!!!

hedda wrote:
Clare was spectacularly right about Iraq.

Most of the country were spectacularly right about Iraq ! (esp the Lib Dems)

I see the loonies are already out ... the stop-the-socialist-worker-sign-on-the-dole brigade !!!!