Somehow this quite nasty piece of information, pretending to be evidence of criminal collusion but actually totally gratuitous, sums up everything wrong with Britain today. Smear them, ruin their lives because it's fun, innit? We really have turned into a vindictive society.

Isn't this why Barristers are paid fortunes though? Any angle, any supporting evidence, anything for a win?

Vindictive or evidence? Unsavoury to hear it, agreed, but its all about context and the right to use supporting evidence to make a point connected to the prosecution.....I guess until a judge rules its use is unconnected to the point trying to be made, and therefore inadmissable ?, it'll be used and reported.............

Not saying its right or wrong, but its the system

And sadly the system is well and truly broken!

Mr Reason wrote:
Any angle, any supporting evidence, anything for a win?

... but that's our adversarial system ... the other side will be doing exactly the same.

JK hints that its not relevant - BUT it is evidence of an ongoing "link" between the two.

I think it is great that these two scumbags' sordid 'gossip' is splashed all over the media, just as they dished it out to many people during their pathetic careers.

Well normally I wouldn't condone it, but it does sound quite relevant apropos conspiracy. And after all those two have done to invade other people's privacy, for no just reason, I can't say I care.

I absolutely understand all the feelings (do please watch Vile Pervert: The Musical) but I have to say... are we as bad as them? And I simply don't like the deliberate, vindictive and nasty action which cannot do anything to prove more of a "close relationship" between these two than the one we already knew about.

I'd much rather see an independent 'investigating magistrate' system in place.

the two are being judged by the criteria they set and endorsed in a thousand tabloid tales where no quarter was ever offered to either the guilty or the innocent who were mere pawns to be demolished in the pursuit of profit.

This dame caused at least one innocent man to be murdered because of her 'name and shame' campaign and it could be said the murder of another recently was an end result of her folly.

the exposure of their personal life is nothing. They are simply reaping karma.

I wonder if they both were thinking if their relationship was in the public interest?

Nice one, Angel!

hedda wrote:
the two are being judged by the criteria they set and endorsed in a thousand tabloid tales where no quarter was ever offered to either the guilty or the innocent who were mere pawns to be demolished in the pursuit of profit.

This dame caused at least one innocent man to be murdered because of her 'name and shame' campaign and it could be said the murder of another recently was an end result of her folly.

the exposure of their personal life is nothing. They are simply reaping karma.

Oh, Hedda !

This is common sense - twice in one week !

I'm getting worried LOL

comes around! I definitely recall Coulson once saying, "we're here to inform, titillate and excite."

Well, you've certainly done that mate - the king of tabloid journalism has finally been tabloided himself!

What sort of person has an affair before and after getting married? It is revolting!

Rebekah does seem to have a thing about powerful married men. I do hope our Prime Minister was careful.