I remember during my trials how I became convinced that British Justice obtains convictions by BOREDOM. It suffocates the truth with a load of trivial detail so jurors get boggled to death and vote GUILTY just to get out of there.
In my case, details of how I managed to get loads of hits were examined in minute detail, all proving, said the Prosecution, that I was a Vile Pervert. Not at all but the point wasn't to prove anything; just to bore the jurors into stopping listening.
Indeed, when 99% of "evidence" produced illustrated that I played someone lots of music, gave them promotion copies of releases ("bribes" said hairy prosecutor), and let them come to visit me around 50 times, jurors would be encouraged to believe the 1% that never happened. But actually, I decided, it was hammering facts and proof into their heads so they simply stopped thinking about the faulty 1% of lies.
Ditto the Phone Hacking trial. Who cares about Rebekah Wade (as was) and how she conducted her daily work schedule?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/08/...e-hacking-old-bailey

indeed it's true. I've sat in on sensational murder trials and you could be bored to death.

Another reason hacks rarely cover trials these days and usually get it all wrong if they do.

JK, BOTH sides should present their respective cases as they see fit. In greater or lesser detail to a jury rightly expecting 'The Whole Truth And Nothing But".

Your wrongful conviction came not from a confused jury, but from a culture of juries daily mind-raped for years by the likes of Dacre and Wade.

The latter now rightly being examined in great detail for her 'alleged' criminal behaviour.