there is something very distasteful about Mia Farrow's relentless campaign against Woody Allen
(I'm told by those who have met her that we aren't dealing with a major intellect).

Even if true, on the scale of assaults it's of the 'touching ' variety but Farrow's campaign to publicly air it is quite disgraceful given she has many children.

Yet not one newspaper, not one pundit or hysterical hack jumping on Mia's bandwagon has pointed this out :

if it is true that Frank Sinatra is her son's father (and in photos he does look very much like Sinatra)...Farrow misled Woody Allen for decades into believing he was the father. I cannot think of a more despicable deceit in a marriage.

she lied and lied relentlessly until now it suits her purpose because Allen's career is being highlighted.

If she lied about such an important matter, what else does she lie about?

if ever the term 'woman scorned' was applicable..........

but one only has to say "pedo pedo" and all sanity flies out the window

hedda wrote:
... if ever the term 'woman scorned' was applicable...
Without offering any excuse or sympathy for Farrow over this, surely "Being publicly dumped by your spouse so they can marry your adopted child from a previous marriage" must be pretty high up on anyone's list of worst-case humiliation scenarios... the fact that Soon-Yi & Woody have now been married longer than Woody & Farrow were even together (Woody & Farrow never actually married) must also rankle more than somewhat...

So yes, I think "scorned" is probably about right.

I think he is probably Woody Allen's child.

I can see why Mia Farrow was disgusted. You simply cant cop off with your children's sister. It is wrong wrong wrong.