Cry the papers today.

Does anyone else smell total manure?

I never liked Savile. Members of my extended family in Leeds had a number of run ins with him over a number of decades, but the allegations are getting into real Alice in Wonderland fantasy proportions now. What the hell is this all hiding and taking deflection for?

The Guardian article seems like an advert for Slater And Gordon. More about Liz Dux than JS.

Seems pretty obvious who might have leaked it!!

Roll Up!!! Still a chance to get your claim in!!


www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/ji...sed-1000-victims-bbc

Yes actually rather distressing to read such a shit story, so badly written, in The Observer, which is becoming unreadable. The Sunday Times is better.

Really can't be bothered to read it. Even if they are real police can't arrest a dead man.

So, are they suggesting that at - say - Top Of The Pops ALL of the BBC staff were "in on it".
The no-nonsense producers such as Robin Nash & Michael Hurll? Pan's People & Legs & Co? The make-up women, the cameramen and Johnny Pearson & The Shambles Orchestra? Oh really.
The BBC didn't pay well enough for anything like to go 'overlooked' as people had a moral-compass then (perhaps unlike today's baby-fiddlers?) - and the idiots suggestion is people like Bill Cotton, Roger Ordish and Johnnie Stewart rubber-stamped "paedophilia"?

They might as well say it's 1000 - not one million.

Perhaps someone should also tell the conspiracy perverts that Jimmy Savile was so *elite* that his family are still all staunchly working class. Or is that a *conspiracy* too?

Well said Chris - spot on; I knew not only most of those mentioned but executives since interviewed (very badly and one sided-ly) by Yewtree. The BBC staff simply did NOT know - and most don't believe anything was going on behind a 100% wall of silence.

65 million people in the UK. 1,000 is a small number of people, that fantasize in order to think, they might make a bit of cash for their poorly funded pension. If it mean't so much to them, why did they go to "risky" places to meet so called celebrities...when they could of been funding themselves, back in the day? Thinking the average 14 year old did a paper round, or helped the milkman. Oh yeah forgot, most of these people went to "special" schools, as they were just plain thick & people were used to their lies. So the question is...why believe them now?

Strange coincidences.
Observer article - a 'showcase' for the ambulance chasers of Slater & Gordon? www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/ji...sed-1000-victims-bbc

A company with a VESTED INTEREST in the DLT case running a completely unnecessary news headline story in a 'big news week' that basically rubbished much of the likely 'defence' of another case presently at trial
www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-centre/pres...rge-dave-lee-travis/

Chris Retro wrote:
Strange coincidences.
Observer article - a 'showcase' for the ambulance chasers of Slater & Gordon? www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/ji...sed-1000-victims-bbc

A company with a VESTED INTEREST in the DLT case running a completely unnecessary news headline story in a 'big news week' that basically rubbished much of the likely 'defence' of another case presently at trial
www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-centre/pres...rge-dave-lee-travis/

This bit I find quite amusing: (What is she on about "forensic" indeed?) These so called "victims" should be represented by men & not easily led Esther Teeth, soudalikes.
Liz Dux, a lawyer representing 74 of Savile's victims, said Smith had been forensic in her examination of witnesses and her report was likely to cause serious concerns for those at the top of the organisation. She said: "Every single opportunity Savile took it. He never had a quiet day basically so these numbers wouldn't at all surprise me.

Surely this country has created enough "gangsters" over the decades with a hatred of paedophilia and child abuse that if they had heard *anything* like this directed towards Savile, they would have "done him"?

I know around here that a disabled kids charity got turned over. Lets just say that those responsible were not well for a while afterwards (and the charity got their money back.) I'm not saying that gangsters are pleasant, but they run by rules and kids are off limits.